[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers

  • From: Carrie Karnos <ckarnos@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:59:35 -0800 (PST)

Hi Evan,

One option is for blind validators to set the font of the entire book to 11 (or 
thereabouts). I don't particularly like this option because it's harder for 
sighted people to see chapter and section titles when they are the same size as 
the regular text, but it is an option.

Just an FYI, Carrie

----- Original Message ----
From: EVAN REESE <mentat3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 1:47:46 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types 
of disabled bookshare readers


I 
think 
you're 
right 
on 
this. 
Being 
unable 
to 
see 
the 
screen, 
I 
have 
no 
idea 
how 
I 
can 
be 
aware 
of 
- 
let 
alone 
correct 
- 
font 
problems 
without 
checking 
the 
font 
of 
every 
word 
in 
the 
book 
manually. 
I 
have 
checked 
the 
fonts 
of 
headings 
when 
scanning 
or 
validating 
books, 
but 
for 
the 
rest, 
I 
just 
have 
to 
assume 
the 
fonts 
are 
okay. 
A 
person 
with 
enough 
vision 
to 
see 
the 
screen 
can 
look 
at 
a 
whole 
page 
and 
see 
that 
something 
is 
out 
of 
whack. 
I 
don't 
see 
how 
somewhat 
with 
insufficient 
vision 
could 
do 
anything 
similar. 
If 
I 
am 
mistaken, 
please 
let 
me 
know. 
I 
could, 
of 
course, 
check 
each 
page 
in 
Word 
or 
K1000 
and 
see 
what 
kinds 
of 
fonts 
are 
on 
it, 
and 
what 
the 
sizes 
are. 
But 
as 
far 
as 
I 
know, 
those 
programs 
don't 
tell 
you 
which 
font 
is 
where 
on 
the 
page. 
So 
someone 
who 
cannot 
see 
the 
screen 
would 
need 
some 
way 
of 
hearing 
- 
on 
the 
fly 
- 
when 
the 
font 
changes 
and 
the 
new 
characteristics. 
Is 
that 
possible? 
Unless 
that 
can 
be 
done, 
or 
there 
is 
another 
way 
for 
someone 
with 
little 
or 
no 
vision 
to 
be 
aware 
of 
font 
problems 
without 
a 
great 
deal 
of 
time 
consuming 
manual 
checking, 
it 
seems 
unrealistic 
to 
expect 
that 
books 
on 
Bookshare 
will 
have 
no 
font 
problems, 
as 
long 
as 
people 
with 
little 
or 
no 
vision 
are 
submitting 
or 
validating 
them.

Evan

----- 
Original 
Message 
----- 
From: 
<james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: 
<bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 
Monday, 
February 
04, 
2008 
8:55 
AM
Subject: 
[bksvol-discuss] 
Re: 
Question 
on 
Scan 
quality 
for 
blind 
vs 
other 
types 
of 
disabled 
bookshare 
readers


> 
Hi,
> 
I 
will 
add 
to 
this 
that 
as 
a 
blind 
validator, 
it 
would 
probably 
be
> 
difficult 
to 
correct 
all 
font 
problems. 
If 
I 
am 
incorrect 
about 
this, 
I 
am
> 
certainily 
open 
to 
validation 
help.
>
> 
Jim
>
> 
James 
D 
Homme, 
, 
Usability 
Engineering, 
Highmark 
Inc.,
> 
james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 
412-544-1810
>
> 
"it 
is 
only 
possible 
to 
live 
happily 
ever 
after 
on 
a 
day-to-day 
basis." 
--
> 
Margaret 
Bonnano
>
>
>
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
"Anastasia
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Saridakis"
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
<anamatia81@yahoo  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
To
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
.com>  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Sent 
by:  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
cc
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
bksvol-discuss-bo
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
unce@xxxxxxxxxxxx  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Subject
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
g  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
[bksvol-discuss] 
Re: 
Question 
on
>  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Scan 
quality 
for 
blind 
vs 
other
>  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
types 
of 
disabled 
bookshare 
readers
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
02/01/2008 
07:48
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
PM
>
>
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Please 
respond 
to
>  
  
  
  
  
  
 
bksvol-discuss@fr
>  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
eelists.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
Hi 
Judy
>
> 
Before 
telling 
you 
my 
thoughts 
about 
your 
question 
let 
me 
introduce 
myself
> 
I'm 
Anastasia; 
I 
am 
legally 
blind 
and 
use 
a 
screen 
enlarger. 
So 
I 
can 
see
> 
the 
print 
but 
it 
is 
straining 
so 
I 
prefer 
to 
listen.
>
> 
Here 
are 
my 
thoughts: 
I 
scan 
in 
one 
file 
type 
that 
keeps 
the 
format, 
kes,
> 
and 
submit 
it 
in 
one 
that 
deletes 
the 
format. 
This 
type, 
rtf 
is 
more
> 
universal. 
RTF 
automatically 
deletes 
the 
formats. 
It 
is 
more 
fluid
> 
listening 
to 
it 
without 
the 
format. 
However, 
I 
can 
understand 
as 
someone
> 
who 
reads 
print 
why 
keeping 
the 
format 
in 
tact 
for 
the 
recent 
members
> 
would 
be 
beneficial, 
the 
only 
format 
that 
keeps 
the 
print 
in 
tact 
is 
KES
> 
and  
that 
is 
not 
a 
universal 
file. 
I 
hope 
I 
have 
answered 
your 
question 
If
> 
you 
have 
further 
questions 
or 
would 
like 
to 
further 
discuss 
this 
topic
> 
please 
email 
me 
off 
list.
>
> 
Anastasia
>
>
> 
Looking 
for 
last 
minute 
shopping 
deals? 
Find 
them 
fast 
with 
Yahoo! 
Search.
>
>
>
> 
To 
unsubscribe 
from 
this 
list 
send 
a 
blank 
Email 
to
> 
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
put 
the 
word 
'unsubscribe' 
by 
itself 
in 
the 
subject 
line.  
To 
get 
a 
list 
> 
of 
available 
commands, 
put 
the 
word 
'help' 
by 
itself 
in 
the 
subject 
line.
>
> 

 
To 
unsubscribe 
from 
this 
list 
send 
a 
blank 
Email 
to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 
the 
word 
'unsubscribe' 
by 
itself 
in 
the 
subject 
line.  
To 
get 
a 
list 
of 
available 
commands, 
put 
the 
word 
'help' 
by 
itself 
in 
the 
subject 
line.







      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 

Other related posts: