Jumping in here on this one. The usability issue here is navigation. In DAISY it is the font size that determines navigability. By adjusting both lines to the appropriate and identical size the reader can skip right to them. As a review for new volunteers see the manual chapter 4 ( http://tinyurl.com/3dzv4g4 ): 4) Use these font sizes: For the: 20 point + BOLDING Book title 18 point + BOLDING Larger section headings (such as "Part I", or "Section 2") 16 point + BOLDING Headings for each section in the Front Matter, & Back Matter 16 point + BOLDING Chapter headings 14 point + BOLDING Chapter subheadings 12 point Text in the body of the book 5) Maximum font size for anything in the file: = 20 point Minimum font size for anything in the file: = 8 point Scott From: Kim Friedman <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>> Reply-To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:14:59 -0700 To: "bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New proofreaders Hi, I think the usual practice is to put the chapter title after the chapter number. If I find the number of the chapter after the title, my feeling is that as long as it's in the book, okay, but put it where it makes sense, i.e., before the title. Regards, Kim Friedman. -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Syfert Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:36 PM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New proofreaders Yes, I'm a deranged perfectionist. I also am a reader and a critic at the same time. Question for all: If a chapter number has a title, which should go first? ________________________________ From: Kim Friedman <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 11:13 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New proofreaders Hi, congratulations. Welcome and heartfelt best wishes as a proofreader. If you are a deranged perfectionist, you will probably be talking shop about all manner of stuff (I found myself talking about page breaks of all things). If it really bugs you when you see a typo or you're the kind who reads every word of a file from first to last, you are officially a deranged perfectionist. I personally think all proofreaders should be picky and meticulous. I also tend to proofread stuff I'd prefer to read, so I have two things going for me: I get to have a great time reading a book first and I'm making sure the book is readable for anybody else who cares to download it once it's added to the Bookshare collection. So I have the reader and the critic staying in my head as I'm proofreading. The reader is blithely going along reading and the critic says: "Hold on there, buddy, I noticed a scanno on p. 20, now we have to take care of that before you can go back to your fun." Then there's that lovely email that says: "Your book has been added to the Bookshare library". So far I'm not jaded by this process, but then, I'm not one can call a prolific proofreader. I take on one project at a time and it suits me. Take care. Regards, Kim Friedman. -----Original Message----- From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Syfert Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 7:10 AM To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: New proofreaders Yippee! I've been approved! I've been approved! "I'm somebody now" (to paraphrase Steve Martin in a movie whose name escapes me right now). [http://mail.yimg.com/ok/u/assets/img/emoticons/48.gif] I already have a book proofread to send in ("Dark Is The Sun" by Phillip Jose Farmer)! Tim ________________________________ From: "Jamie Yates, CPhT" <mirxtech@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mirxtech@xxxxxxxxx>> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:28 AM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] New proofreaders Why is it taking over 3 months to approve new proofreaders after they complete their first test book? -- Jamie in Michigan Currently Reading: Minding Ben by Victoria Brown See everything I've read this year at: www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html<http://www.michiganrxtech.com/books.html>