[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fair Quality Scans: No Longer Accepted
- From: Guido Corona <guidoc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:18:13 -0600
The minimum acceptable accuracy for a 'good' book is 98.6%. Anything less
is a candidate for rejection. G.
Guido Dante Corona
IBM Research,
Human Ability & Accessibility Center, (HA&AC)
Austin Tx.
Phone: 512. 838. 9735.
Email: guidoc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.ibm.com/able
". . . Maybe it was only those who were most certain they were right who
were guaranteed to be wrong. And that maybe, just maybe, those who
questioned the most were in the end those who came closest to being wise."
[David Poyer, The Command]
"E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/15/2008 06:57 PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
[bksvol-discuss] Re: Fair Quality Scans: No Longer Accepted
I have never tried that method. What is the minimum for a book to be
rated "good" rather than "fair" using the system you describe?
E.
At 07:51 PM 1/15/2008, you wrote:
>A validator could just take the book to Step 2 and do an abortive
>upload - that is, upload the book to Step 2 before even beginning to
>work on it, and then close the browser window before hitting either
>of the approve or reject buttons - and get a recognition figure. If
>it is below the minimum, then he/she can either reject at that
>point, or decide whether it is worth a cleanup to get it above that
figure.
>
>Hopefully, in the not too distant future, books will be evaluated at
>submission in a similar manner to that which they undergo after
validation.
>
>Evan
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:37 PM
>Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Fair Quality Scans: No Longer Accepted
>
>
>>What is to prevent a submitter just saying the submit is "good"
>>instead of "fair" and not improving the quality of the submit?
>>There is nothing in the system which judges a book at time of
>>submission is there?
>>
>>E.
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
>>list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
>>
>
>To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
>list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
>
>
>__________ NOD32 2792 (20080115) Information __________
>
>This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>http://www.eset.com
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
Other related posts:
