Badges - Re: A Question For Everyone

  • From: "William Taylor" <usms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:59:47 -0400

There are a couple different kinds of FPS.  The FPS you see in uniforms 
guarding buildings are I think just about all contract guards. They aren’t 
government employees.  They are hired by a private contractor and may or may 
not have law enforcement background.  Around this area of Ohio they finally 
went to automatics.  They do not carry their weapons to and from the job site.  
There are also FPS agents who from what I see appear to administer the 
contracts and show up in really flashy marked patrol vehicles and wear blue 
bdu’s.  Not sure what enforcement authority they have.   The court security 
officers running the access points into the federal courts are also contract 
employees. They are not government employees and they only have authority while 
they are at work on the job.  They are by and large completely retired police 
officers.  They also cannot carry their issued weapons out of the office, so 
they carry their own weapons to and from.  They get it and are good guys.    
The take your gun off at the door policy is one I agree with for non uniform 
officers or agents. In our building, if you don’t have an office in the 
building, you lock your gun up at the front check point.  I don’t care if the 
guy has 25 years and is a 300 shooter, if he’s not in our building and may or 
may not be known to the people responsible for securing the interior and 
exterior,  they aren’t carrying a gun.  It’s a safety issue for our guys and 
for the guys we make lock their weapons up.   I get into a lot of police and 
sheriff’s offices and very few make me remove my weapon, but when they do, I 
just do it. It’s their house they can run it the way they see fit.

 

From: badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Christopher Karney
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:29 PM
To: badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Badges - Re: A Question For Everyone

 

I have found the FPS guards up there with the TSA "officers" at O'Hare and 
Midway Airports in terms of incompetence.  The US Marshalls are a different 
breed though.

Sent from my iPhone


On Aug 30, 2011, at 16:43, Mike Volling <mvolling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This happens in Chicago as well.  What annoys me there is exactly what happened 
to you:  they make you leave the building, walk across the street, lock your 
weapon up there, and come back to their side of the street.  Nothing like 
walking across the street in downtown Chicago in full uniform with an empty 
holster to make you feel vulnerable.  

I've never understood why they do that.  I wouldn't dream of telling a Federal 
Officer he had to disarm before walking into our station.  I could only imagine 
the reaction if we did, yet they have no hesitation about making you do it.  

 


  _____  


From: C D Rowsell <cd2u@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, August 30, 2011 1:43:32 PM
Subject: Badges - Re: A Question For Everyone

I attended an event last Friday with the U. S. Dept. of Labor, put on in the 
San Francisco Federal building. Going in at 0830, I ID’d myself and told the 
security I was carrying a weapon. The early morning crew let me right through 
without a problem. A group of us then left at noon for a tour of an offsite 
facility. When we returned, we had to repeat the screening process. This time 
the day time crew was on duty and the supervisor for the building (Federal 
Protection Services) happened to be standing in the lobby next to the Dept. of 
Labor reception desk.  The uniform FPS guys took my ID and told her that I had 
been in the earlier meeting and was returning from the tour. She basically said 
no way I was getting back in with my weapon. The uniform guys then suggested I 
go check my weapon at the California Superior Court located across the street 
and one of FPS guys walked over with me to do it. He was telling me that since 
the shootings at Federal buildings (Las Vegas particularly), they don’t even 
let the retired Feds (FBI etc.) come into the building armed. (The private 
security contractors working the early morning shift apparently didn’t know 
this little piece of information.) With all the discussion that occurred my 
second time in, this either hadn’t occurred since the policy was instituted 
(for the security contractors) or the policy hadn’t been communicated to them 
properly when it was instituted.  I do have to commend the FPS guys who really 
did accommodate me. They could have simply told me I wasn’t getting back in 
with a weapon and not bothered with me any further. 

 

So all you Feds on the list, it appears the fun goes away once you retire. 

 

CD

 

From: badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:badges-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of SWColony@xxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:23 AM
To: badges@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Badges - Re: A Question For Everyone

 

While I am not a fan of TSA, I do think flight security needed to be taken out 
of the hands of private contractors.  I also think the expansion of the FAM 
program was good.  DHS has some problems, but I don't think DHS is the 
"boogeyman" some folks make it out to be.  All in all, I don't know that I feel 
"safer", but I do feel more "aware" and that makes me feel more secure.  

 

As Mike pointed out, I have the luxury, as a fed, of carrying my firearm 
everywhere I go, to include on commercial aircraft.  I'm sure that contributes 
to my feeling of well being.  However, a lot of local and state cops take 
advantage of LEOSA, which did not exist pre-09/11.  Even though it excludes a 
few places, it does allow cops to carry nationwide.  I think that helps.  I 
also think a lot more private citizens are now legally armed, and that also 
contributes to my feelings of a safer environment. 

 

I definitely don't fear the government.  I'm leery of it, and very aware of it, 
as I think all citizens should be, but I don't fear it.  

Russell

 

In a message dated 8/29/2011 8:11:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
CarlGlas@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

As we approach the tenth anniversary of the tragedy of September 11, 
2001, I have a question to ask of each
of you.

With the creation of Homeland Security, the Transportation Security 
Administration, and all the other federal agencies that were created 
with the intentions of making us all feel safer, do you?

Do you feel any safer or secure today than you did on September 10, 2001?





The Badges Law Enforcement Discussion Group - Est. 1997

Other related posts: