[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:51:11 -0700
> At 07:47 AM 9/29/2012, Eric Goldstein wrote:
>> Jim, there is nothing "native" about that transparency. The mismatch between
>> life and the contrast limitation of the medium is glaring. Had you shot
>> negative or digital, the result would have been dramatically different.
I think this is a 'Like DUH' statement!
>>
>> Your preferences/interpretation is another matter... All I can say is there
>> is no accounting for taste ;-)
Well... you certainly got me here. Obviously, all of my 'taste', is in my mouth!
>>
>> Eric Goldstein
>>
>
> Eric,
>
> Please clip your messages.
>
> Your lust for digital is overwhelming. In light of your rather stern views,
> I am certain that we shall all immediately dump our film cameras and get only
> digital gear hereafter.
>
> Be well,
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
Jim Brick
Sunnyvale, CA
http://www.photomojo.org
On Sep 29, 2012, at 5:32 AM, Marc James Small wrote:
Other related posts:
