[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 23:32:18 -0700
Uwe,
It is not HDR. I didn't like the HDR version. I guess I wasn't clear. Sorry...
You are seeing the original.
I have an Imacon X1 scanner.
Jim Brick
Sunnyvale, CA
http://www.photomojo.org
On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:17 PM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> as I looked at the photo I thought "Wow, it looks like HDR - and it's just a
> scan from an analog photo - great!" Now that I know that it's HDR, I'd like
> to see the original - which I know is impossible...
>
> Anyway - which scanner do you use?
>
> Uwe
>
> 2012/9/29 Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Hi John, I have been using HDR since HDR software has been available. I use
> it both in my digital capture and in scanning. Sometimes, things just look
> better (to me) in their native form. I do have both over and under of that
> Hunter Liggett photograph, and I did scan all three and run them through
> Photomatix. Still, for me, the way I have it, is the way I want it. Which, as
> I said, is the bottom line.
>
> HDR certainly has become more sophisticated since its inception. In the
> beginning, it was nearly impossible to use it with scanned frames as it
> couldn't figure out how to align them. Nowadays, programs like Photomatix and
> Photoshop CS6 have no trouble aligning multiple transparency scans.
>
> :-)
>
> Jim
>
>
> Jim Brick
> Sunnyvale, CA
> http://www.photomojo.org
>
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:02 AM, John Wild wrote:
>
>> Eric,
>>
>> I have found that by scanning at 2 or 3 different exposures – one under, one
>> over and one normally – and combining them in HDR software that I can get
>> more out of an image. If a transparency, there may not be enough in the
>> shadows and highlights to pull out anyway.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On 28/09/2012 07:12, "Eric Goldstein" <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> A digital sure would have done better with capturing contrast... no detail
>>> in the shadow areas that come through on the scan...
>>>
>>> Eric Goldstein
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke
>>> <paintingwithlenses@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> awesome - digital cameras can hardly reach that!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/9/28 Chris Burck <chris.burck@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> beautiful colors.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 27, 2012 6:33 PM, "Jim Brick" <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> It depends on what your idea of affordable is...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have one of these lenses for my SL66 and it is absolutely outstanding!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is an image via my 40mm FLE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.photomojo.org/Yellow_Field_Oak_Tree-.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim Brick
>>>>>> Sunnyvale, CA
>>>>>> http://www.photomojo.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 27, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Uwe Wolfgang Steinke wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hi Carlos
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > and thanks for the superb answer!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Sooo, where do I get an affordable 4/40 FLE for my SL66 or 6008AF?
>>>>>> > Lots of wishes for the next Christmases.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Uwe
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Rollei List
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
>>>>>> in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>>>>> <//www.freelists.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>>>>>> 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>>>>>> <//www.freelists.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Online, searchable archives are available at
>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Uwe Wolfgang Steinke
>
>
>
Other related posts:
