[rollei_list] Re: Carl Zeiss Rolleiflex SL66 1:4/40 mm Distagon FLE HFT
- From: Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:48:26 -0400
Hi Marc -
You may want to give my post another read... it clearly states
"negative or digital."
Eric Goldstein
--
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 07:47 AM 9/29/2012, Eric Goldstein wrote:
>>
>> Jim, there is nothing "native" about that transparency. The mismatch
>> between life and the contrast limitation of the medium is glaring. Had you
>> shot negative or digital, the result would have been dramatically different.
>>
>> Your preferences/interpretation is another matter... All I can say is
>> there is no accounting for taste ;-)
>>
>> Eric Goldstein
>>
>
> Eric,
>
> Please clip your messages.
>
> Your lust for digital is overwhelming. In light of your rather stern views,
> I am certain that we shall all immediately dump our film cameras and get
> only digital gear hereafter.
>
> Be well,
>
> Marc
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
