Re: Oracle's relationships with expert DBAs (and the rest of us mere mortals)

  • From: William B Ferguson <wbfergus@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:39:14 -0600

I did like C/PM better, but M/PM was multi-user!   Whoopie!!!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                               Bill Ferguson
            U.S. Geological Survey - Minerals Information Team
                           PO Box 25046, MS-750
                           Denver Federal Center
                          Denver, Colorado 80225
           Voice (303)236-8747 ext. 321     Fax   (303)236-4208
      ~ Think on a grand scale, start to implement on a small scale ~



"bill thater" <shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/01/2006 12:59 PM
Please respond to
shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx


To
wbfergus@xxxxxxxx
cc
oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: Oracle's relationships with expert DBAs (and the rest of us mere 
mortals)






On 6/1/06, William B Ferguson <wbfergus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm still bummed that there is absolutely NO support, or any plans from
> Oracle to EVER support the Z-80 M/PM architecture!
>
> That was a piece of cake to work on.
>
> Now, has this thread digressed enough from it's subject line?     :^)

damn youngster, C/PM was better.;-)



-- 
--
Bill "Shrek" Thater     ORACLE DBA
       shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To live in dialogue with another is to live twice. Joys are doubled by
exchange and burdens are cut in half.  - Wishart
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: