[opendtv] Re: Copps proposes more FCC action
- From: "John Willkie" <johnwillkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:34:01 -0700
In just what world would 300 complaints in a market of hundreds of thousands
where something that had been working for more than 50 years suddenly
changed overnight to something totally different and incompatible NOT be a
good thing?
Bob, you are a freelance whore. You still set the bar high for that which
you oppose, and set it low for that which you favor. And, that which you
favor doesn't even have a toehold on this continent.
Just how many DVB television sets have been sold in the U.S. in the last ten
years? How many entities have transmitted DVB services for more than 30
continuous days? (I didn't say tests)
John Willkie
-----Mensaje original-----
De: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Bob Miller
Enviado el: Sunday, September 14, 2008 4:19 AM
Para: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [opendtv] Re: Copps proposes more FCC action
The idea that the Wilmington experience was "bad" or good depends on
what you consider your starting point. The FCC and you consider just
getting past the transition without a riot of problems, protest or
whatever as good or a success. This all in a population of 7% who
still depend on OTA TV in a flat coastal plain.
I have a different perspective. I think that by now, after almost 10
years of DTV broadcasting in the US, the actual end point of the
transition should have been a non event since by now success, IMO,
would be the fact that every home in Wilmington had at least one OTA
DTV device that was being used and that the average home in Wilmington
had around 5 or 6 OTA DTV receivers.
Success would be defined by a small article in the Fisherman's Post
Newspaper reminding people of that little known event called analog
turnoff and just how much of a non-event it had turned out to be.
Bob Miller
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Albert Manfredi
<albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bob Miller wrote:
>
>> If you were referring to my post I think it is on point and
>> very current.
>>
>> Maybe you could point out what you think is from the early
>> 2000s in it.
>
> No, actually I was referring to the whole rash of negative posts, that
seem frozen in time. The only "current" topic was Wilmington. Wasn't
Wilmington successful? Initially, I don't know by now, they got 104 trouble
calls from 13,000 to 15,000 OTA households. And of those, 41 percent were
about unspecified reception problems. That's bad?
>
> That aside, what comments were made that were anything resembling current?
All I saw was hyperbole.
>
> Bert
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> See how Windows connects the people, information, and fun that are part of
your life.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093175mrt/direct/01/
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
>
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
>
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
