Thanks, Harry, but they do not have anything to worry about from me! I'm not skilled enough!! Al --- Harry Wade <hww@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 05:13 AM 12/14/04 -0800, you wrote: > >While I realize that the Stuart design is probably > patented, > > Al, > We've had a discussion or two along these lines > before on the List, > and although it depends upon what your intentions > are, IIRC the concensus > was that a "casting(s)" alone is/are not > copyrightable and if you make a > pattern then it is your original creation and you > are free to have castings > from it. > Of course the drawings for the castings and > it's parent mechanism are > certainly copyrightable, and the parent mechanism > may indeed be patentable > (although in this case I don't think patents are an > issue), but you as a > modeler are in the clear unless you copy the design > or any part of it and > offer it for sale commercially as your own. Stuart > (for instance) would > then have a valid copyright complaint, as they have > lodged against an > Australian company who produce what appear to be > rather blatant copies of > Stuart engines. > > Regards, > Harry > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email > to, > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > "unsubscribe" in the subject line. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.