[lit-ideas] Re: Londonistan
- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:36:44 -0800
Does that mean you accept all the other things I quoted, that you only have
a problem with this one thing - the treatment of Muslims in European Law
Courts? Or does it mean that this one thing is so important to you that it
occludes all the other things I quoted? Eg., though several of the quotes
have to do with Europe's inability to integrate Muslims into European
society, you are not sure what I mean when I say that.
Bawer discusses Muslim treatment in European Law Courts in considerable
detail, but I am not properly motivated to set Berlinski aside and return to
Bawer to provide quotations - especially if you accept all the other things
from Bawer and Berlinski I quoted. Wakey, wakey?
Lawrence
_____
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Judith Evans
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 11:19 AM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Londonistan
LH>Right, "Total nonsense
Yes.
LH>the Muslims getting away with almost anything
LH>they like and the judges and cops are letting them so as not to seem
LH>racist.
is TOTAL NONSENSE
LH>No problem with race.
I didn't say that. Our police have been found to be institutionally racist,
and the NHS has been accused of it too. This is a racist country. Also it's
Islamophobe. Is it more racist than the US? Perhaps. Is it more
Islamophobe than the US? Perhaps. Perhaps they are racist and Islamophobe
in different ways.
LH> No problem with integration.
I didn't say that -- not that I am sure what you mean.
LH> No Muslim problem.
Define "Muslim problem"
LH> No problem with multiculturalism.
I don't know what you mean.
LH> Everything fair under the law."
I didn't say that. I said your
LH>the Muslims getting away with almost anything
LH>they like and the judges and cops are letting them so as not to seem
LH>racist.
was nonsense. It is.
Judy Evans, Cardiff
Other related posts:
