> Eric: Sure there is. By privileging the offense to > Muslims, you ignore the offense to those who value > free expression, and wish to practice it in their > own countries. "Freedom of speech" is a misdirection argument, the rhetroical equivalent of a magician giving you the wrong hand to look at. I have the freedom to walk up to you and call you an asshole but I would have to be an insufferable idiot to exercise that right without a really good reason. By the way, an informal poll of two Muslims I work with told me they are upset about the cartoons because there was no reason for them: they served no purpose. > And David Savory's "nigger" comparison is not apt. > The drawings weren't "hate speech." They were > devoid of ethnic/racial slurs. That's not for you to decide. If the recipient of the slur calls it a slur then you have a problem to deal with as if it were a slur. If I call you an asshole it's not up to me to decide how offended you ought to feel. If you tell me you're offended, I should believe you. And you should believe me when I say I will say no more on this subject. David Savory Vancouver David Savory ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html