--- Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: JE> >>I think you miss the point, which concerns > offence. > EY> No, Mr. Lundbech gets it exactly right. Anything > you do can offend somebody--it's just a question > of whose offense you want to privilege. David Savory wrote: DS>Way to completely miss the point Stan. If you knew anything about Islam you'd >know you don't draw pictures of Muhammad. Period. P. Lundbech "replied" >Yeah, and Hindus don't eat cows, because it's sacrilegious. If >you knew anything about Hinduism you'd know you don't eat cows. Period. >There'll be an awful lot of taboos in the world if all religions >were to have it their way about what we can and cannot do. to that alleged reply to David Savory I replied JE> >>I think you miss the point, which concerns > offence. Nothing there about privileging offence. I leave this thread (I have had quite enough of it, on another list as well...) with news of another Free Speech Cause Celebre for you guys: http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,,1705297,00.html Judy Evans, Cardiff ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html