"François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is currently obviously a snooze() in Tracker that makes it so > > slow (IIRC). Queries from the Terminal are magnitudes faster. > > The speed problem Joachim mentioned stems from 1000s of results, > > not > > 10000s of mails total. And that will continue to be a problem. > but remember query in Terminal doesn't have to lookup the mimetype, > get > the icon, ... > maybe even not have to stat the inode since it gets the dirent. The speed penalty is currently much much higher than this could possibly cause. Bye, Axel.