[geocentrism] Re: Saul of Tarsus

  • From: "Niemann, Nicholas K." <NNiemann@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:07:59 -0500

Neville,
How do you conclude I've conceded the Catholic Church is man-made when I
referred to it as God-made????  (The Catholic Church and the Roman
Catholic Church are the same thing, in case you don't realize this).
 
Your non-existent garden shed analogy isn't on point.  You have built an
existent "Yeshua" religion (apparently one you believe is without
manmade structure).
 
Regards,
Nick.
 

  _____  

From: Dr. Neville Jones [mailto:ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 6:36 PM
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Saul of Tarsus


Nick,
 
My "man-made structreless religion"? If it has no man-made structure
(and notice that, by implication, your are conceding that the Roman
Catholic Church is a man-made structure), then how can it be man-made?
To illustrate, if I have not built a garden shed, then how could the
non-existent garden shed have been built by me?
 
Well, I'm certainly glad that everything is now clear to you, although I
am a little puzzled as to why you are then asking me the same question
that I have already told you I cannot answer.
 
Neville.


"Niemann, Nicholas K." <NNiemann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

         
        Neville,
         
        Yes.  Exactly.  Perfectly clear.  Remove the manmade structure
from all of these religions (including your manmade structureless
religion). What you will then have left is the only true God-made
religion, i.e. the infallible Catholic Church.  Then we will "suddenly"
"all be in accord"-------not only with each other, but also with God.
         
        Thank you for clarifying the problem.
         
        Regards,
        Nick.

  _____  

How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for
FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/photos/*http://uk.photo
s.yahoo.com/> 
This message and any attachments are confidential, may contain privileged 
information, and are intended solely for the recipient named above.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivery to the named 
recipient, you are notified that any review, distribution, dissemination or 
copying is prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, you should 
notify the sender by return email and delete the message from your computer 
system.

Other related posts: