Hi Dan, Thank you for your opinions, which grossly misstate religious history. Can you tell me if you claim to be infallible on religious matters. Regards, Nick. _____ From: Dan [mailto:danchap9@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 2:46 PM To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Saul of Tarsus Nick, In ancient times, there was a man named Nimrod, who was the grandson of one of Noah's son named Ham.Ham had a son named Cush who married a woman named Semiramis.Cush and Semiramis then had a son named him "Nimrod." After the death of his father, Nimrod married his own mother and became a powerful King. The Bible tells of this man, Nimrod, in Genesis 10:8-10 as follows: "And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad,and Calneh, in the land of Shinar." Nimrod became a god-man to the people and Semiramis, his wife and mother, became the powerful Queen of ancient Babylon. Today this system manifests itself in the form of the Roman Catholic Church which in fact is the Roman Empire in priestly cloths descended from the Babylonians Medo Persian Greeks then Rome who in turn controls all major world religions on the face of this earth including Christianity. The same ancient trinity is at the heart of all of them that's why in these days they are all merging together as one. Every major religion on the face of this earth has a trinity of some kind. They ALL stem from Babylon just after the tower of Babel. Neville is totally correct in saying "if we all replace the man-made structure of our "church" with Yeshuwa', then would we suddenly not all be in accord? Not Jesus but Yeshuwa. Jesus is the Latin derivative of Isis. Dan. "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Nick, If my opinion is so fallibly clueless (hmmm, wait a minute, doesn't that mean that I'm infallible?), then why are you asking me for my opinion? Your position is that the Roman Catholic Church is the channel between mankind and God. However, a Baptist considers that his miinister is the channel between himself and God. A member of the Church of England considers that the Queen of England is the channel between himself and God. A Jehovah's Witness believes that the Governing Body of that organization is the channel between himself and God. ... Do I make myself clear? And ALL of you say that your view is correct and everyone else's is wrong. However, if we remove all such organized religion, do not all of these differences then evaporate? I.e., if we all replace the man-made structure of our "church" with Yeshuwa', then would we suddenly not all be in accord? Regards, Neville. "Niemann, Nicholas K." <NNiemann@xxxxxxxx> wrote: Neville, Thank you for your fallible opinion, which means you admittedly really have no idea if what you are saying is correct. Can you not see that the Catholic Church is the mystical Body of Christ. Are you really that clueless about what the Catholic Church actually teaches or do you just like to launch uninformed viewpoints. My faith is in Christ, Who gave us the Roman Catholic Church, which He said He would protect. When did I say "All who call upon the name of the Roman Catholic Church will be saved." I didn't. Please follow the discussion precisely, without interjecting what you apparently believe others have told you about Catholics or about the Catholic Church. Regards, Nick. _____ Yahoo! Messenger <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.me ssenger.yahoo.com> NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.be ta.messenger.yahoo.com> _____ Discover Yahoo! Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=32659/*http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch .html>
This message and any attachments are confidential, may contain privileged information, and are intended solely for the recipient named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivery to the named recipient, you are notified that any review, distribution, dissemination or copying is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you should notify the sender by return email and delete the message from your computer system.