[geocentrism] Re: Saul of Tarsus
- From: "Niemann, Nicholas K." <NNiemann@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 15:19:52 -0500
Hi Dan,
Thank you for your opinions, which grossly misstate religious history.
Can you tell me if you claim to be infallible on religious matters.
Regards,
Nick.
_____
From: Dan [mailto:danchap9@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 2:46 PM
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Saul of Tarsus
Nick,
In ancient times, there was a man named Nimrod, who was the grandson of
one of Noah's son named Ham.Ham had a son named Cush who married a woman
named Semiramis.Cush and Semiramis then had a son named him "Nimrod."
After the death of his father, Nimrod married his own mother and became
a powerful King. The Bible tells of this man, Nimrod, in Genesis 10:8-10
as follows: "And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the
earth. He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said,
even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord. And the beginning of
his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad,and Calneh, in the land of
Shinar."
Nimrod became a god-man to the people and Semiramis, his wife and
mother, became the powerful Queen of ancient Babylon. Today this system
manifests itself in the form of the Roman Catholic Church which in fact
is the Roman Empire in priestly cloths descended from the Babylonians
Medo Persian Greeks then Rome who in turn controls all major world
religions on the face of this earth including Christianity. The same
ancient trinity is at the heart of all of them that's why in these days
they are all merging together as one. Every major religion on the face
of this earth has a trinity of some kind. They ALL stem from Babylon
just after the tower of Babel.
Neville is totally correct in saying "if we all replace the man-made
structure of our "church" with Yeshuwa', then would we suddenly not all
be in accord? Not Jesus but Yeshuwa. Jesus is the Latin derivative of
Isis.
Dan.
"Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nick,
If my opinion is so fallibly clueless (hmmm, wait a minute,
doesn't that mean that I'm infallible?), then why are you asking me for
my opinion?
Your position is that the Roman Catholic Church is the channel
between mankind and God. However, a Baptist considers that his miinister
is the channel between himself and God. A member of the Church of
England considers that the Queen of England is the channel between
himself and God. A Jehovah's Witness believes that the Governing Body of
that organization is the channel between himself and God. ... Do I make
myself clear? And ALL of you say that your view is correct and everyone
else's is wrong. However, if we remove all such organized religion, do
not all of these differences then evaporate? I.e., if we all replace the
man-made structure of our "church" with Yeshuwa', then would we suddenly
not all be in accord?
Regards,
Neville.
"Niemann, Nicholas K." <NNiemann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neville,
Thank you for your fallible opinion, which means you
admittedly really have no idea if what you are saying is correct.
Can you not see that the Catholic Church is the mystical
Body of Christ. Are you really that clueless about what the Catholic
Church actually teaches or do you just like to launch uninformed
viewpoints.
My faith is in Christ, Who gave us the Roman Catholic
Church, which He said He would protect.
When did I say "All who call upon the name of the Roman
Catholic Church will be saved." I didn't. Please follow the discussion
precisely, without interjecting what you apparently believe others have
told you about Catholics or about the Catholic Church.
Regards,
Nick.
_____
Yahoo! Messenger
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.me
ssenger.yahoo.com> NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with
voicemail
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/default/messenger/*http://uk.be
ta.messenger.yahoo.com>
_____
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=32659/*http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch
.html>
This message and any attachments are confidential, may contain privileged
information, and are intended solely for the recipient named above. If you are
not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivery to the named
recipient, you are notified that any review, distribution, dissemination or
copying is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you should
notify the sender by return email and delete the message from your computer
system.
Other related posts:
