Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Your arguments make no sense they are circular, based on the ASSUMTIONS. These prove nothing about Paul. It is you who are blind by your desire to impeach Paul and assumtions about things for wich you do not understandand namely the L&P and Jesus, and were not there nor can you validate. Your argument does not hold up in any Logical debate or Court on the Earth,.. The following statement by Saul of Tarsus condemns him: (Rom 4:5 KJV) But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Since: (Exo 23:7 KJV) Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked. And: (Prov 17:15 KJV*) He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to YeHVaH. (* The blessed Name has been reinstated in its rightful place in this scripture.) Furthermore, I have demonstrated from his own words that his accounts (regarding the supposed "conversion" of this self-proclaimed "apostle") are contradictory. People who give contradictory accounts are liars, because they do not stand up to cross examination. This is well known in courts of law. These are not my opinions, but facts from his own writings. Our understandings of the law and of the prophets can never be reconciled whilst you continue to be misled and deceived by Saul, because you base your position on lies. Neville. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PCcalling worldwide with voicemail