[geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis
- From: geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:19:54 +0100
Philip wrote:
> Aberration (optical) is the distortion of a view of a moving object or
> moving observer in the camera of an observer, caused by the following. The
> different angles of observation of different parts of the object/s being
> viewed.
This is why it is important to UNDERSTAND a scientific theory before
trying to refute it. What you are talking about is a different type of
aberration.
It is quite amusing to note that the lack of any observed parallax of
the stars used to be used as "proof" that the earth didn't move. Then
in 1725 James Bradley managed to observe the "parallax" and it seemed
that all the stars must be at the same distance. It turned out that
this "parallax" was actually due to aberration and the real parallax is
much smaller.
> It seems necessary, to explain the phenomenon of aberration, and also the
> doppler effect observed and alleged to be due to the annular orbit of the
> earth, that in addition to a rotating cosmos every 24 hours, it would also
> be necessary for it (cosmos) to be gyrating every 24 hours at the angle of
> inclination given to the earth. This by the way is a natural phenomenon in
> rotating masses if unbalanced either in mass distribution or gravitational
> force. They have the earth doing it!
>
> This would explain all the obdervation/mechanics of a sun centred earth
> orbit, and the seasons. etc.
What are you saying? That the Sun is now the centre of universe? Or
that all the stars (including the sun) rotate around the earth every 24
hours and all the stars (except the sun) also girate in sympathy with
the sun?
Regards,
Mike.
Other related posts:
