[geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:13:19 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: <geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis
>
> Why would it be? That's just a silly assertion. I might as well say in
> reply "No, if evolution were false you'd be a ham sandwhich". Justify
> your claim.
OK Mike,
I'll make the same statement to you as I made to Alan.
The evolution idea stands or falls on abiogenesis. Until someone can
demonstrate that life can come from non-life (not to just say it), then
Louis Pasteur was right. Life can only come from life. Without this
evolution is merely a system of philosophical beliefs about origins. That is
why NASA is supposedly sending probes all over the universe searching for
anything that can be construed as life because they believe it will help
them figure out how life started on Earth. Carl Sagan died a disappointed
man because SETI produced nothing. Please, please do not bother replying
unless you can come up with answer or point to an answer.
Jack Lewis
Other related posts:
