[dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
- From: Johnathan Detrick <jdetrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:57:06 -0400
I like the avatar route better than the stats for deities route. Again,
everyone else would have to vote. It works better for me, but I got the
distinct feeling last night that the others disagreed.
widderslainte wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Johnathan Detrick
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 14:49
> > To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
> >
> >
> >
> > The Forgotten Realms pantheon may be a cluster&^%$ (or
> > was it cluster$%^&?), but it is interesting. In my opinion,
> > that's what's most important. But I agree that gods with
> > stats aren't always the way to go. I normally hate them. But
> > it might just be appropriate in this case.
>
> The Forgotten Realms has parts of 9 or 10 pantheons that overlap with
> varying degrees of clarity. The Greyhawk pantheons make a bit more
> sense, but you wouldn't know if from looking at the players handbook.
>
> Everyone creating a wacky avatar or two (with stats) for each god would
> be cool. You could make a whole new game by giving each character-god
> some powers and let them fight over (and distribute powers to) potential
> adherents in exchange for worship. Then you could end of with a couple
> competing pantheons.
Other related posts:
