[dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
- From: "widderslainte" <widderslainte@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:52:55 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Johnathan Detrick
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 14:49
> To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
>
>
>
> The Forgotten Realms pantheon may be a cluster&^%$ (or
> was it cluster$%^&?), but it is interesting. In my opinion,
> that's what's most important. But I agree that gods with
> stats aren't always the way to go. I normally hate them. But
> it might just be appropriate in this case.
The Forgotten Realms has parts of 9 or 10 pantheons that overlap with
varying degrees of clarity. The Greyhawk pantheons make a bit more
sense, but you wouldn't know if from looking at the players handbook.
Everyone creating a wacky avatar or two (with stats) for each god would
be cool. You could make a whole new game by giving each character-god
some powers and let them fight over (and distribute powers to) potential
adherents in exchange for worship. Then you could end of with a couple
competing pantheons.
Other related posts:
