[dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
- From: Johnathan Detrick <jdetrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:48:52 -0400
The Forgotten Realms pantheon may be a cluster&^%$ (or was it
cluster$%^&?), but it is interesting. In my opinion, that's what's most
important. But I agree that gods with stats aren't always the way to go.
I normally hate them. But it might just be appropriate in this case.
widderslainte wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 09:52
> > To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: Tuesday morning review
> >
> >
> > I'd like to see some input from Shawn
> > Barrick as well. He's the historian
> > here! :)
>
> I'm here. Been too swamped with work to make a comment of substance
> yet. Realize, from an anthropological perspective, you guys are going
> about it backwards - gods, then people & cultures. Somewhere, I've got
> a document or two that may be of great help. Secondly, the FR (and
> Greyhawk) pantheons, as presented, as clusterf$%^& - to put it gently.
> Third, gods with stats are stupid. Really.
Other related posts:
