[rollei_list] Re: Scanners
- From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:14:54 -0500
> Hi Austin:
>
> Ok. Personally, I save from both programs in tiff and then use the tiff as the
> bottom layer in a photoshop file.
>
> If anybody feels 'scanner raw' is better than a 16 bit tiff, please enlighten
> us as to why.
You end up with more information to work with.
For sure no clipping. You feel like you are working from an original
negative not making a copy print. Not making a print from a print but a
neg.
A raw file is meatier juicier and has more flavor. I'm sure more bio
nutrients. But those are only the free range raw files.
Mark William Rabiner
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
