[rollei_list] Re: Scanners
- From: Petr Dvorak <pdvorak@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:42:52 -0500
The way I see it, one cannot do any serious post-processing of scans without
16bpp editors. The last time I checked, PS Elements supported 8bpc only (but
that was years ago). If you can live without all the marketing toys of
consumer-oriented editors and if you are familiar with dark room workflows
and their equivalents in the digital world, Picture Window Pro may be the
best (budget) photo post-processing software you can get.
http://www.dl-c.com/
Ad the Vuescan Pro version: if you go the RAW path, all the bells and
whistles, ICC profiles, color spaces and FOREVER free upgrades just take up
space on your hard disk.
Petr
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Don Williams <dwilli10@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Being sort of budget conscious I use Photoshop Elements, now up to Version
> 7. It costs very little at CostCo (none down there I suppose) and has a
> built-in pano function. I have used it to create a 360 degree scan from the
> center of a park nearby and to put together a 11X17 print from college days
> that had to be scanned in sections. Works just fine for things like that.
>
> DAW
>
>
Other related posts:
