> I use a handheld meter for incident readings which I consider the most > accurate where applicable. This is what I was taught and no other > explanation of other complex methods have been as convincing. > Frank > > On 31 Aug, 2009, at 14:45, Jan Decher wrote: > >> Most handheld meters have much to broad a metering angle to match >> the accuracy of built-in TTL meters, and their usefulness is >> overrated. We were just last week writing about how the many named Luna-Pro digital has a 25 degree acceptance angle. Has real grabbing power. It's a Gossen SBC Silicon Photodiode Ambient compact lightweight low light reading EV -2.5 to +18 at iso 100 angle of coverage is 25 degrees reflected and 180 incident. Mark William Rabiner --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list