The square would not be my first choice for landscapes, though certainly it has been done and done well. 69 or 612 come to mind if roll film's you thang...
Eric Goldstein
At 05:14 PM 6/2/2006 -0700, Peter K. wrote:
>I guess the real question is why are peope using 35mm for >landscapes? Something like that is much better with a medium format >camera? Rolleiwide perhaps?
The answer is... because they can. Many great photographers have made a more than handsome income using 35mm for landscapes. Galen Rowell, Pat O'Hara, Art Wolfe, George Lepp, Franz Lanting, etc, etc, etc.
Jim
--- Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list