[racattack] Re: RAC Attack Automation Project

  • From: Alvaro Miranda Aguilera <kikitux@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "racattack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <racattack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:32:26 +1200

Hello Erik,

I end using OL6.4 for UEK2 plus updates.

I did build the box and I have it at
https://dl.dropbox.com/s/n6jgw99vrwk4k02/oracle65-racattack.14.04.07.box

I am in the process of testing it..

also, had a chat over emails with Jeremy, and he suggest that we may go to
6.4 from iso with no updates, so we can have a consistent base box image
rather than a rolling one for updates.

I did build both of the boxes and I am testing 6.4->6.5 with uek2 now

will test tomorrow 6.4 and will report back.

if 6.4 works, we may end defaulting to that one..




On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Erik Benner <erik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> How about base it off of 6.3 instead. There are other issues with 6.5 the
> newer UEK and comparability.
>
>
> Sent from my iPad Air
>
> On Apr 6, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Alvaro Miranda Aguilera <kikitux@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Leighton Nelson <leightonn@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> 1369107.1
>
>
> Hello, thanks for testing this out.
>
> I will default the kernel to the RH compatible one, to make that part
> works out of the box as the intention is.
>
> Oracle release patches manually to make ACFS to support UEK/UEKR2 (not
> sure for UEKR3 yet), so will be left to the person to follow up that if
> they want to do it manually
>
> as for the other feedback, I will incorporate those as-well
>
> thanks again,
>
> Alvaro.
>
>

Other related posts: