Janet Cull wrote: > > A friend has 2 Pentax 67's and is willing to part with one. I've read > reviews and they're mixed. The last one I read said it was a > disappointment using handheld. Do you know how the 67 compares to the > 645? Thanks again! I have owned Pentax 645s (manual focus) and Pentax 67s. (I went through several used cameras before I gave up on one used vendor and found a new-old-stock 645 at a local shop.) I currently own a Pentax 67II (refurbed by Pentax). I really liked the Pentax 645 for hand held shooting. I had a 75mm auto focus lens (the shop didn't have a manual lens when I bought the body) and a 150mm manual focus lens. I used a couple of 120 inserts. The viewfinder was very nice, bright and easy to focus. The meter worked well, and the TTL mode worked fine with a Pentax AF-280T flash. The auto focus lens worked nicely in manual focus mode. I have the Pentax 67II because I wanted a bigger negative, and I got a good deal on this camera. The camera works like a big 35mm camera, but it is very heavy. I haven't put them on a scale, but I'm fairly sure the 67II with AE prism, 105mm lens and flash bracket weights more than my 4x5 camera. I think the newer camera would work fine without the flash bracket, but you might want the bracket with the older cameras that don't have the gripping area on the right side of the body. I have used the Pentax 67 handheld. I have a few close ups (105mm lens with Hoya close filters) that I took handheld at 1/30 (flash sync speed) with the Pentax AF-280T flash that are sharp across the frame. With the flash as primary light source the exposure is short enough not to worry about camera motion. If you want to balance the flash with ambient lighting, then the 1/30 sync speed is likely going to be a problem. I was in the process of deciding whether to keep the 645 (convenient) or the 67II (big negative) when the 645 was stolen. If I still had both I'd probably sell the 67II and keep the 645. I occasionally look at Hasselblads (I really like 6x6 and waist level finders), but the cost of adding additional lenses to a basic camera (body, back, WLF, 80mm) has me using Yashica Mats instead. In your original post on this thread you mention that you don't like the Hasselblad being confined to the tripod. Why do you keep it on the tripod? Is it too heavy for you to hand hold? Do you have trouble tracking with the waist level finder? Have you tried one of the prisms for the Hasselblad? Can you borrow one of your friend's Pentax 67s for a weekend? If not you might want to try renting a 67 or 645. Actually using the camera can save you a lot of grief later. -- Brian Reynolds | "It's just like flying a spaceship. reynolds@xxxxxxxxx | You push some buttons and see http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ | what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan NAR# 54438 | ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.