[pure-silver] Re: print washer

  • From: John Stockdale <j.sto@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:48:46 +1000

In "Photo Techniques" a few years ago there was a two part article called "Mysteries of the Vortex" about water flow in washers.

It was apparently originally printed in a UK magazine. Here are links to the two parts:

http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=296

http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=3486

Worth a read.

John

=====================================


On 2010-05-20, at 1:50 AM, Peter Badcock wrote:

Thanks Jean-David,

That's rather depressing to read.  I'd love to see the test details/conditions if possible.  Were they testing residual fixer levels in the paper to a level that is considered archival by today's standards/consensus ?    In the mean time I'll see what I can do to make it shower over the top.

rgds
Peter

On 20 May 2010 00:11, Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When I got my Zone VI print washer, Fred Picker enclosed a test report of print washers by a test lab he hired. I assume Zone VI paid for the testing, so the Zone VI came out first -- about the same as the East Street print washer that was no longer available. The oscillating Patterson tested the worst. They found the oscillating feature was of no use and you got comparable results with it or without it. They made it work about as well as all the others if they built a gizmo that showered the water in the top all over the reservoir. But by the time I read that, I had no interest in making something like that and besides it was not big enough for 11x14 inch prints.



============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: