[pure-silver] Re: Any news from Ilford?
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:08:55 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Valvo" <dvalvo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Any news from Ilford?
>A little ID is used as an emulsion stabilizer which means
>it can't be taken
> out completely for RC papers.
>
> Dave
But how much effect does it have on development kinetics?
Papers made for activation processing are characteristic in
having a very short induction time. I use Kodak, Ilford, and
Agfa papers and can see the difference between the Ilford
papers which cannot be used in activation processors and the
Kodak and Ilford papers which can. I do not consider this a
shortcoming but only something that is observable.
The developers I generally use for printing are Kodak
Dektol 1:2 and more recently Agfa Neutol Plus 1:9. At these
dilutions these two behave very similarly.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
