On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13/06/2014 23:37, Jonathan Blake wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: > > My main thought is that it would be nice to get all the books in a state > where there is nothing outstanding against them. Currently that entails: > > 1) testing The Hunger of Sejanoz for spelling/gameplay issues > 2) agreeing on the placement of the small illustrations in Book 28 (done?) I ran through the small illustrations, and I agree with their placement. Anyone else? > 3) footnotes issues across the books I'm open to this one. > 4) re-scanning the maps for Books 9-18 to remove jpeg artefacting, and > editing certain labels (see > <http://www.projectaon.org/en/Errata/MapCorrections>) There are some original scans available on the website, but not for all of 9-18. I don't think this one should hold up publication of 28 because it'll take a little while. http://www.projectaon.org/staff/jonathan/Original%20Scans/ > I think most of the footnote issues I raised (post dated 30/03/2014) are > straightforward and can be decided upon/resolved quickly, though there are a > few that might require a bit of discussion. Conversion to errata where > possible seems the way to go, I reckon. I can't see it would delay release > of Book 28 by any more than a week or two,* and would mean we don't have the > pain of having to frequently update the "All-in-One" mega-download of all > the books. > > * And it's surprising how quickly people respond about contentious issues > such as footnotes and how we can remove them! :) I'll try to respond to the footnote discussion within a day or two. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at //www.freelists.org/list/projectaon