[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 14:56:52 -0500
I stand corrected. Logically it doesn't work. Maybe the "all" is
misplaced. Maybe it's like the argument that all drug addicts started with
marijuana, but they all drank milk too. Andy would have figured this out.
Irene can't do it. Weird.
> [Original Message]
> From: Ursula Stange <Ursula@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 12/11/2005 2:36:24 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
>
> Eric first and Irene second wrote...
>
> >>Recent political differences revolve around other
> >>issues:
> >>
> >>*Is globalism ultimately tenable? I think not. (In
> >>my leftist vision of what helps workers most, I
> >>think a strong nationalism best serves the cause.)
> >>Others disagree.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Strong nationalism is what dictators like to see. Aggressors too.
Japan,
> >for example, was/is strongly nationalistic. Warlike countries are all
> >nationalistic.
> >
> >
> Ursula thinks (almost to herself...)
>
> All Catholics are Christians
> All Lutherans are Christians
> -----------------
> All Catholics are Lutherans
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
