[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: "Irene" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:50:15 -0500
> [Original Message]
> From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 12/9/2005 2:52:47 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
>
And doing so only
> contributes fictive entities. Now this is a lit list so nothing wrong
> with introducing fictive entities. In fact we already have fictive
> posters so what the hell.
>
>
Phil, what would you have had me do? I could not get on the list as me.
Did you get that? I could not get on the list as me. You don't remember
me posting through people? I finally gave up. This was the only solution
available. What would you have done in my place?
Irene
P.S. Eric now says it was a surprise announcement. Was it really a
surprise?
> Sincerely,
>
> Phil Enns
> Toronto, ON
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
