[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:19:34 EST

Oh Irene....you think too much.
 
But blessings anyway.
 
Julie Krueger 
 

========Original  Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation 
and Elision  Date: 12/10/05 7:18:26 PM Central Standard Time  From: 
_aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   To: 
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:    
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stone  <pas@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:  12/10/2005 7:46:10 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and  Elision
>
> At 07:40 PM 12/10/2005, you wrote:
> >What  for?  There were no technical issues.
>
> Why did you use a  'male' pseudonym?


Don't know.  That was mistake, not the  pseudonym.  Maybe because Mike once
said it was mano a mano talking to  me, or something along those lines.  I
thought what the heck, let me see  if it's true.  Amago was the real me.  So
is Irene.  Everyone  has different sides.


> Why didn't you sign up as "eyore"  


I don't know what an eyore is.  



and then say  "hey, this is Irene, Andreas 
> won't let me on the  list?


Right.  And then start the game all over again of him  holding my posts, me
posting through other people.  You try it and see  how you like it.



> Why did you continue the  charade?


See above.  There was no other way to be on the  list.


> Why did you TELL us now?


Because I thought you  suspected, or at least Julie ("who on this list read
Russian?"; "my alter ego  screen name" post she wrote; Eric with his "can I
quote you on that" in  response to words I remembered using on phil lit,
plus the "Amago program"  the way Camp was; Mike's just the facts ma'am). 
Actually I'm sorry now that  I did tell the truth.  It's like Mike said
about having an affair.   I should have kept it to myself forever.



> Did you EVER in the  past couple of years after initial startup, TRY to 
> rejoin as  Irene?


No, for the reasons stated above.  For Judy, M.A. Camp  was not thrown off
for substantive issues.  He simply wasn't talkatiave  and communicated as
best he could.   Now there are fitness tests  that have to be passed.  A far
cry from what Andreas said to Amago when  he joined, that it's anything goes
on this  list.






>
> p
>
>  _________________
> [insert pithy quote here]
> Paul Stone
>  pas@xxxxxxxx
> Leamington, ON. Canada
>
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To  change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest  on/off), visit  www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html


------------------------------------------------------------------
To  change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest  on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: