[LRflex] Re: Photokina and other disasters...

  • From: "telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:04 -0400

Chris Birchenhall <chris@tarsier=2Efreeserve=2Eco=2Euk>

> Thanks for that informative response=2E To summarize: the greater the le=
vel
of
> automation the more difficult it is to make an economically viable, high=

> quality screen=3F

The automation per se isn't the problem but the fully semi-silvered mirror=

diverting viewfinder light to the AF or focus confirmation sensor would be=

the weakest link in the viewfinder system=2E  No matter how good the rest =
of
the system is the light loss for the electronic focus confirmation would
limit the viewing quality=2E  R bodies from the R4 on to the R9 have a ful=
ly
semi-silvered mirror to allow for the multiple metering patterns using a
single meter cell, so it's unlikely that with this metering setup we'll se=
e
a viewfinder as good as the SL2's, and the additional light loss for an
AF/focus confirmation system further degrades the viewing system=2E

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www=2Ewildlightphoto=2Ecom


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: