[jhb] Re: Not too hot

  • From: 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:15:32 +0000

Thats a new one on me Gerry - SWBO

She Who Bellows Orders perhaps?  ;-)

Kev T



Gerry Winskill <gwinsk@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Paul,
> 
> The last bit reminds me.  Towards the end of the summer I lashed out on 
> a very expensive pair of biking jeans. Inside they have a thin layer of 
> Aramid; a Kevlar style material, that provides the protection I get from 
> leathers, at a lower weight. When on the phone to a friend across, SWBO 
> reported I'd bought another bike, also these expensive jeans. When she 
> explained the cost was because of this "special mesh", the friend said 
> "oh, that'll be for the incontinence pads!".
> 
> Gerry Winskill
> 
> 
> Paul Reynolds wrote:
> 
> >Now then Gerry,
> >
> >As SWMBO would say, you need to get away, have a change of surroundings,
> >relax and enjoy yourself.  And if that's what SWMBO says then that's what
> >you'll do.  After all SWMBO doesn't stand for nothing!
> >
> >As for being slightly damp, that last landing a bit tricky then? Or have the
> >incontinence pads leaked again?
> >
> >Paul, toungue firmly in cheek.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> >Of Gerry Winskill
> >Sent: 29 January 2008 14:07
> >To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >
> >
> >Real real weather looks even worse, looking through my window in Ramsey!
> >It's all right for you lot, just switch off FSX and you can get away
> >from the "real IOM" weather; some of us can't. To be fair, "some of us"
> >hasn't left the Island for two years and isn't going off next week in a
> >state of euphoria!
> >
> >Gerry Winskill, slightly damp.
> >
> >
> >Mike Brook wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>Real weather looks awful at EGNS at the moment ...
> >>
> >>M.
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
> >>Sent: 29 January 2008 13:19
> >>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>
> >>Will be logging on from 14:30 at EGNS and Mike should  be here sometime
> >>there abouts. Fred
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
> >>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:02 PM
> >>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Sounds good.
> >>>
> >>>bones
> >>>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
> >>>Sent: 28 January 2008 12:44
> >>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Just been in touch with Mike,he can manage tomorrow Tues afternoon.OK?
> >>>Fred
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
> >>>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:27 AM
> >>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Alas no, as SWMBO has the day off and is threatening to drag me out
> >>>>to look at cutlery (believe it or not).
> >>>>
> >>>>The chances of escaping this are less than those of a snowball in
> >>>>hell.
> >>>>
> >>>>Tuesday to Thursday look good..
> >>>>
> >>>>bones
> >>>>
> >>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>>>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
> >>>>Sent: 27 January 2008 20:24
> >>>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Bones, Just been on the phone to Mike to see when he can come on
> >>>>line. His best chance at the moment is 14:30 tomorrow Monday.Would
> >>>>that be OK with you?  Fred
> >>>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
> >>>>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:08 PM
> >>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>A very good point Kevin as it highlights the absolutely essential
> >>>>>need for  clearances to be read back by the pilot (and ATC to listen
> >>>>>to
> >>>>>this) so  that  errors are trapped.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Any clearance involving a height or heading should be repeated by
> >>>>>the aircraft so both parties are clear about what is going to
> >>>>>happen.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>bones
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>>>>Behalf Of 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>Sent: 27 January 2008 19:55
> >>>>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Just online at Farnborough, delighted to see Jerry on the apron as I
> >>>>>logged on. Flightplan to EGNS (home). Winds calm, he was heading for
> >>>>>runway 06.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>He called up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Herein I have to apologise, my performance was poor, I suggested a
> >>>>>heading from 06 which should have routed him direct to NORRY, his
> >>>>>first waypoint. Traffic was light but mostly using 27 at Heathrow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Diamond 068 took off and turned on a heading which kept him out of
> >>>>>EGLL airspace but on a Northerly heading. I should have asked, but
> >>>>>as I didn't confirm any clearance, I watched as he climbed, still
> >>>>>Northbound for another 10 miles, at which point I wondered if my 300
> >>>>>degrees had been heard as 360 degrees and asked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Jerry accepted "own navigation" and spent some time travelling West
> >>>>>to regain his original flightplan......Sorry.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This only serves to highlight the need for clearance so that both
> >>>>>parties are aware and can follow the flight progress. I'm still
> >>>>>trying to avoid the pregnant pauses over clearances as I look up the
> >>>>>lesser used ISEC's and Fix's...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Once again apologies offered.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>G'day
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
> >>>>>26/01/2008 15:45
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
> >>>>26/01/2008 15:45
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>No virus found in this incoming message.
> >>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date:
> >>>27/01/2008 18:39
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 




Other related posts: