[jhb] Re: Not too hot
- From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
- To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:59:58 -0000
Mike did extremely well on his first session in IVAO. Once he gets connected
I would be delighted to have him join us at JHB.
bones
-----Original Message-----
From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Fred Stopforth
Sent: 29 January 2008 19:05
To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
Appreciated your ATC and encouragement to Mike.He enjoyed it enough to
invite himself back next Monday night and possibly see how things go
elsewhere i.e. to go from one air field to another and how we cope with
changing radio freq to talk to other ATC's.So once he's set up on internet I
don't think it'll be long before you'll have to do another introduction
act. Fred
----- Original Message -----
From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:02 PM
Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
> Sounds good.
>
> bones
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
> Sent: 28 January 2008 12:44
> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>
>
> Just been in touch with Mike,he can manage tomorrow Tues afternoon.OK?
> Fred
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
> To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:27 AM
> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>
>
>> Alas no, as SWMBO has the day off and is threatening to drag me out
>> to look at cutlery (believe it or not).
>>
>> The chances of escaping this are less than those of a snowball in
>> hell.
>>
>> Tuesday to Thursday look good..
>>
>> bones
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>> Sent: 27 January 2008 20:24
>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>
>>
>> Bones, Just been on the phone to Mike to see when he can come on
>> line. His best chance at the moment is 14:30 tomorrow Monday.Would
>> that be OK with you? Fred
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>> To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:08 PM
>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>
>>
>>>A very good point Kevin as it highlights the absolutely essential
>>>need for clearances to be read back by the pilot (and ATC to listen
>>>to
>>>this) so that errors are trapped.
>>>
>>> Any clearance involving a height or heading should be repeated by
>>> the aircraft so both parties are clear about what is going to
>>> happen.
>>>
>>> bones
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>> Behalf Of 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: 27 January 2008 19:55
>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>
>>>
>>> Just online at Farnborough, delighted to see Jerry on the apron as I
>>> logged on. Flightplan to EGNS (home). Winds calm, he was heading for
>>> runway 06.
>>>
>>> He called up.
>>>
>>> Herein I have to apologise, my performance was poor, I suggested a
>>> heading from 06 which should have routed him direct to NORRY, his
>>> first waypoint. Traffic was light but mostly using 27 at Heathrow.
>>>
>>> Diamond 068 took off and turned on a heading which kept him out of
>>> EGLL airspace but on a Northerly heading. I should have asked, but
>>> as I didn't confirm any clearance, I watched as he climbed, still
>>> Northbound for another 10 miles, at which point I wondered if my 300
>>> degrees had been heard as 360 degrees and asked.
>>>
>>> Jerry accepted "own navigation" and spent some time travelling West
>>> to regain his original flightplan......Sorry.
>>>
>>> This only serves to highlight the need for clearance so that both
>>> parties are aware and can follow the flight progress. I'm still
>>> trying to avoid the pregnant pauses over clearances as I look up the
>>> lesser used ISEC's and Fix's...
>>>
>>> Once again apologies offered.
>>>
>>>
>>> G'day
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>>> 26/01/2008 15:45
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>> 26/01/2008 15:45
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date:
> 27/01/2008 18:39
>
>
Other related posts:
