[jhb] Re: Not too hot
- From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
- To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:57:00 -0000
Nope - I got hit by about 800. Luckily none get past my AV or firewall
software.
The last big attack I got was on Christmas Day when I detected about 1000
attempted hits on the system.
bones
-----Original Message-----
From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gerry Winskill
Sent: 30 January 2008 10:31
To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
Am I the only one on the list suffering constant Trojan Horse attack
warnings this morning?
Off for a walk whilst I get Avast to scan the system.
Gerry Winskill
Gerry Winskill wrote:
> Hi Kev,
>
> Ex Rumpole of the Bailey, not my wife, I hasten to add!
> "She Who Must Be Obeyed!"
>
> A certain gent on my list refers to his as "The Management". Both
> references may only be made in writing, behind locked doors or whilst
> wearing BSI Kite marked protective clothing.
>
> Gerry Winskill
>
>
>
> 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Thats a new one on me Gerry - SWBO
>>
>> She Who Bellows Orders perhaps? ;-)
>>
>> Kev T
>>
>>
>>
>> Gerry Winskill <gwinsk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> The last bit reminds me. Towards the end of the summer I lashed out
>>> on a very expensive pair of biking jeans. Inside they have a thin
>>> layer of Aramid; a Kevlar style material, that provides the
>>> protection I get from leathers, at a lower weight. When on the phone
>>> to a friend across, SWBO reported I'd bought another bike, also
>>> these expensive jeans. When she explained the cost was because of
>>> this "special mesh", the friend said "oh, that'll be for the
>>> incontinence pads!".
>>>
>>> Gerry Winskill
>>>
>>>
>>> Paul Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Now then Gerry,
>>>>
>>>> As SWMBO would say, you need to get away, have a change of
>>>> surroundings,
>>>> relax and enjoy yourself. And if that's what SWMBO says then
>>>> that's what
>>>> you'll do. After all SWMBO doesn't stand for nothing!
>>>>
>>>> As for being slightly damp, that last landing a bit tricky then? Or
>>>> have the
>>>> incontinence pads leaked again?
>>>>
>>>> Paul, toungue firmly in cheek.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>>> Behalf
>>>> Of Gerry Winskill
>>>> Sent: 29 January 2008 14:07
>>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Real real weather looks even worse, looking through my window in
>>>> Ramsey!
>>>> It's all right for you lot, just switch off FSX and you can get away
>>>>
>>>> from the "real IOM" weather; some of us can't. To be fair, "some of
>>>> us"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> hasn't left the Island for two years and isn't going off next week
>>>> in a
>>>> state of euphoria!
>>>>
>>>> Gerry Winskill, slightly damp.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mike Brook wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Real weather looks awful at EGNS at the moment ...
>>>>>
>>>>> M.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>>>>> Sent: 29 January 2008 13:19
>>>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>
>>>>> Will be logging on from 14:30 at EGNS and Mike should be here
>>>>> sometime
>>>>> there abouts. Fred
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>>>>> To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:02 PM
>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bones
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>>> On Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>>>>>> Sent: 28 January 2008 12:44
>>>>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just been in touch with Mike,he can manage tomorrow Tues
>>>>>> afternoon.OK?
>>>>>> Fred
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>> To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:27 AM
>>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alas no, as SWMBO has the day off and is threatening to drag me
>>>>>>> out to look at cutlery (believe it or not).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The chances of escaping this are less than those of a snowball
>>>>>>> in hell.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tuesday to Thursday look good..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bones
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>>>> On Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>>>>>>> Sent: 27 January 2008 20:24
>>>>>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bones, Just been on the phone to Mike to see when he can come on
>>>>>>> line. His best chance at the moment is 14:30 tomorrow
>>>>>>> Monday.Would that be OK with you? Fred
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:08 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A very good point Kevin as it highlights the absolutely
>>>>>>>> essential need for clearances to be read back by the pilot
>>>>>>>> (and ATC to listen to
>>>>>>>> this) so that errors are trapped.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any clearance involving a height or heading should be repeated
>>>>>>>> by the aircraft so both parties are clear about what is going
>>>>>>>> to happen.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bones
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>>>>>>> Behalf Of 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Sent: 27 January 2008 19:55
>>>>>>>> To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just online at Farnborough, delighted to see Jerry on the apron
>>>>>>>> as I
>>>>>>>> logged on. Flightplan to EGNS (home). Winds calm, he was
>>>>>>>> heading for
>>>>>>>> runway 06.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He called up.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Herein I have to apologise, my performance was poor, I
>>>>>>>> suggested a heading from 06 which should have routed him direct
>>>>>>>> to NORRY, his first waypoint. Traffic was light but mostly
>>>>>>>> using 27 at Heathrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Diamond 068 took off and turned on a heading which kept him out
>>>>>>>> of EGLL airspace but on a Northerly heading. I should have
>>>>>>>> asked, but as I didn't confirm any clearance, I watched as he
>>>>>>>> climbed, still Northbound for another 10 miles, at which point
>>>>>>>> I wondered if my 300 degrees had been heard as 360 degrees and
>>>>>>>> asked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jerry accepted "own navigation" and spent some time travelling
>>>>>>>> West
>>>>>>>> to regain his original flightplan......Sorry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This only serves to highlight the need for clearance so that
>>>>>>>> both parties are aware and can follow the flight progress. I'm
>>>>>>>> still trying to avoid the pregnant pauses over clearances as I
>>>>>>>> look up the lesser used ISEC's and Fix's...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once again apologies offered.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> G'day
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>>>>>>>> 26/01/2008 15:45
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>>>>>>> 26/01/2008 15:45
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date:
>>>>>> 27/01/2008 18:39
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
