[jhb] Re: Not too hot

  • From: "Paul Reynolds" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:37:56 -0000

Now then Gerry,

As SWMBO would say, you need to get away, have a change of surroundings,
relax and enjoy yourself.  And if that's what SWMBO says then that's what
you'll do.  After all SWMBO doesn't stand for nothing!

As for being slightly damp, that last landing a bit tricky then? Or have the
incontinence pads leaked again?

Paul, toungue firmly in cheek.

-----Original Message-----
From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Gerry Winskill
Sent: 29 January 2008 14:07
To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot


Real real weather looks even worse, looking through my window in Ramsey!
It's all right for you lot, just switch off FSX and you can get away
from the "real IOM" weather; some of us can't. To be fair, "some of us"
hasn't left the Island for two years and isn't going off next week in a
state of euphoria!

Gerry Winskill, slightly damp.


Mike Brook wrote:

>Real weather looks awful at EGNS at the moment ...
>
>M.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>Sent: 29 January 2008 13:19
>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>
>Will be logging on from 14:30 at EGNS and Mike should  be here sometime
>there abouts. Fred
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:02 PM
>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>
>
>
>
>>Sounds good.
>>
>>bones
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>>Sent: 28 January 2008 12:44
>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>
>>
>>Just been in touch with Mike,he can manage tomorrow Tues afternoon.OK?
>>Fred
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 2:27 AM
>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Alas no, as SWMBO has the day off and is threatening to drag me out
>>>to look at cutlery (believe it or not).
>>>
>>>The chances of escaping this are less than those of a snowball in
>>>hell.
>>>
>>>Tuesday to Thursday look good..
>>>
>>>bones
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>>Behalf Of Fred Stopforth
>>>Sent: 27 January 2008 20:24
>>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>
>>>
>>>Bones, Just been on the phone to Mike to see when he can come on
>>>line. His best chance at the moment is 14:30 tomorrow Monday.Would
>>>that be OK with you?  Fred
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "bones" <bones@xxxxxxx>
>>>To: <jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:08 PM
>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>A very good point Kevin as it highlights the absolutely essential
>>>>need for  clearances to be read back by the pilot (and ATC to listen
>>>>to
>>>>this) so  that  errors are trapped.
>>>>
>>>>Any clearance involving a height or heading should be repeated by
>>>>the aircraft so both parties are clear about what is going to
>>>>happen.
>>>>
>>>>bones
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jhb-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>>>Behalf Of 175@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Sent: 27 January 2008 19:55
>>>>To: jhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [jhb] Re: Not too hot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Just online at Farnborough, delighted to see Jerry on the apron as I
>>>>logged on. Flightplan to EGNS (home). Winds calm, he was heading for
>>>>runway 06.
>>>>
>>>>He called up.
>>>>
>>>>Herein I have to apologise, my performance was poor, I suggested a
>>>>heading from 06 which should have routed him direct to NORRY, his
>>>>first waypoint. Traffic was light but mostly using 27 at Heathrow.
>>>>
>>>>Diamond 068 took off and turned on a heading which kept him out of
>>>>EGLL airspace but on a Northerly heading. I should have asked, but
>>>>as I didn't confirm any clearance, I watched as he climbed, still
>>>>Northbound for another 10 miles, at which point I wondered if my 300
>>>>degrees had been heard as 360 degrees and asked.
>>>>
>>>>Jerry accepted "own navigation" and spent some time travelling West
>>>>to regain his original flightplan......Sorry.
>>>>
>>>>This only serves to highlight the need for clearance so that both
>>>>parties are aware and can follow the flight progress. I'm still
>>>>trying to avoid the pregnant pauses over clearances as I look up the
>>>>lesser used ISEC's and Fix's...
>>>>
>>>>Once again apologies offered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>G'day
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>>>>26/01/2008 15:45
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date:
>>>26/01/2008 15:45
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.13/1246 - Release Date:
>>27/01/2008 18:39
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Other related posts: