> "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Another problem is when someone manually fixes the attributes > > (cause they are wrong, or to add more info), reindexing them would > > loose the changes. > > What about introducing "private" or "internal" attributes: attributes > with a bit set to indicate they shouldn't normally be exposed for > viewing/editing in the same manner as user-attached attributes? > (except determined users who use QuickRes, etc., but they deserve > everything they get) The mime db already has a "visible" flag for each attributes. Also, Tracker only shows those in the mime db by default. And the proposed list of attributes to show is built from the mime db. François.