[gmpi] Re: Requirements sections 3.4 and 3.5
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 05:10:12 -0800
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:12:30AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> Speaking of which, I still dont like r15:
>
> "GMPI must provide a way for the host to indicate the current 'quality
> level' (1-10 or 1-100) to plugins. Plugins can use the quality level to
> scale back resource requirements during realtime use. Hosts should always
> render at full quality."
>
> I vote to remove it.
Why? Have you never been in a spot where you want to use a plugin, but you
don't have enough realtime power to run it full-tilt? Or a plugin that has
a 'quality' level built in, already? I have. Many times. I want to
preview them in low or medium quality, while I muck in realime, but when I
render, I don't care how long it takes. This is a perfect candidate for a
well-known control.
> r16: will the host provide a threading mechanism to allow async work to
> take place (eg. FFT processing), or does this come under cross-platform.
It's currently listed under 'Host Services' section 3.14. Again, does that
sectio need to be moved?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
