[gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11

  • From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 05:14:26 -0800

On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:06:28AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 02:59:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > 2) Any changes needed to the "sample-rate at instantiation" req?  It was
> > argued for a bit, then silence.
> 
> I dont think we reached consensus. I'm not sure wether that was just a
> difference in nomenclature, or opinion.

I changed it to:

Plugins must not be expected to support dynamic sample rates. The sample
rate must be set very early in the life of the plugin and not changed.
Plugins can indicate non-support fo a sample rate by returning an error.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: