----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "GMPI list" <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:14 PM Subject: [gmpi] Re: where we is? R 1-11 > On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:06:28AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 02:59:21 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > > > 2) Any changes needed to the "sample-rate at instantiation" req? It was > > > argued for a bit, then silence. > > > > I dont think we reached consensus. I'm not sure wether that was just a > > difference in nomenclature, or opinion. > > I changed it to: > > Plugins must not be expected to support dynamic sample rates. The sample > rate must be set very early in the life of the plugin and not changed. > Plugins can indicate non-support fo a sample rate by returning an error. the samplerate should be provided with all informations regarding memory allocation and initialization process, like number of audio in and audio out. VB ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe