[gmpi] Re: Requirements
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:46:12 -0800
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:45:32PM -0700, Mike Berry wrote:
> >i think it was just a given. all existing plugin APIs that we've been
> >citing as examples permit this. do you have a bone to pick?
>
> 1.) Jeff's valid issue with GUI-less host.
I'll buy that and I'll happily change that.
> 2.) I don't think that it is reasonable to make requirements on how the
> host supports UI changing of parameters. There is just too much possible
> variation (leaving room for innovation). I would strike this requirement
> entirely.
I don't follow this? It's not much different than an auto-generated UI,
except that the plugin provides some bitmapped images and coordinates. How
is that bad?
--
Notice that as computers are becoming easier and easier to use,
suddenly there's a big market for "Dummies" books. Cause and effect,
or merely an ironic juxtaposition of unrelated facts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
