[gmpi] Re: Reqs draft
- From: "Angus F. Hewlett" <amulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:09:08 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Metadata in DLL, pros:
> - Same object provides meta-data and functionality
> - Meta data can be coughed up algorithmically, ie, one DLL can expose
> multiple plugs
Provided the metadata format is rich enough, one DLL can expose multiple
plugs even if the metadata is external.
<Plugin Vendor = "FooWorks" ObjectName = "FooLimiter">
...
</Plugin>
<Plugin Vendor = "FooWorks" ObjectName = "FooCompressor">
...
</Plugin>
(sorry if my *ML grammar is not up to current standards :)
> External metadata, cons:
> - Metadata "file" can get out of sync with the DLL
Not if users are encouraged to treat GMPI plugin folders as single
objects.
> - Footprint of meta data is potentially larger
Not an issue, I think... it won't be more than a few kb in any case.
Regards,
Angus.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
