[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.1
- From: RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:41:11 -0400
>>>
ha ! very strange points. If Cakewalk is not able (because time, resource,
money, policy , strategy or whatever) to follow a common plug-in
architecture, imagine the other companies !! imagines the third parties
plug-ins makers !!! Imagine the companies who build hardware based
audioworkstation !!!
<<<
We want to follow a common plug-in architecture, and are totally able
time/resource/strategy-wise to do so.
But we also need to be realistic. Adoption will take time, so we need to
continue to support what's in the field. There's a big difference between
what we support and what we encourage/prefer. Today we support VST but
prefer DX. Perhaps in 2 years we'll support VST/DX but prefer GMPI.
What I'm bringing to the table, for the common architecture, is a request to
retain interleaved processing. Not a requirement that plugins support,
merely a request that we allow it.
>>>
so why discussing finally !? and what is the exact goal of this GMPI group
!? working for free for CakeWalk !?
<<<
The goal of this group is to develop a common standard that's good for all
of us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
