[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.1
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:10:34 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Grigg" <gmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:52 AM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.1
> Not sure comparing interleaving with run_adding() isn't apples &
> oranges... so Steve, can you address Ron's previous claims about
> performance gains that interleaving makes possible? If he's correct
Interleaving buffer becomes a problem when there is many channels. And for
MultiBuses processing it's very boring to make the routing with interleaved
stereo, 3: 1 5:1 7:1 strips.
> BTW, my suggestion is offered mainly to try to help find an
> accommodation between the disagreeing parties, as I don't have a dog
> in the interleaving race. This kind of compromise-finding is often
> necessary when developing public standards, because different people
> see the issues differently, validly, and no single person is entitled
> to control the whole thing.
The less the programmeur has the choice , the better he programs , the less
is lose time to think about the method , and the fastest he finalyzes his
product in a reliable way.
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
