I agree, the shortcomings of MIDI are irrelevant to the requirements
discussion. What is relevant, is that there are developers who want
it, and I'm not at all sure that they're a minority.
-- Chris G.
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:29:52 -0700, Chris Grigg wrote:>OK. Thanks for the info. >But that seems surely a "workaround" to me ;-)
You're welcome, and I don't deny it's a workaround, I was just answering your question as to whether it was possible; my conclusion is that if you're willing to accept a bit of additional work, it's completely possible.
This discussion is pointless, everything /can/ be done in MIDI, you can just package it up in a custom SysEx packet and send that.
The SysEx isn't be understandable without some extra-MIDI knowledge, but then neither is splitting a 470 note microtonal instrument over 4 channels.
- Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe