[gmpi] Re: 3.15 MIDI
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 15:47:59 -0700
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Martijn Sipkema wrote:
> ok. But no MIDI, no synthesizer. Or you end up thinking up a
> new protocol "better" than MIDI for synthesizer control. And it
> had better be compatible to MIDI because that is what most poeple
> will be using to control synthesizers. And I don't think one should
> be addressing MIDI2 in this plugin spec...
Come on now, we've already GOT something that is "better than MIDI" and it
is easy to make it "compatible with MIDI". Furtherm that's what the
requirements say: must interoperate with MIDI. That's the key -
interoperate.
A host can receive MIDI and turn it into something more useful internally.
A host can turn internal stuff into MIDI.
it interoperates beautifully.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
